Asean Haze Pollution Agreement
After this stage, hotspots registered in Indonesia were selected/filtered during the same period and compared to ASMC shower cards. Based on this analysis, it was found that the fires that caused cross-border turquality were mainly in central California, West Kalimantan, Riau, Jambi and South Sumatra. We filtered brand hotspots (FHS)  after a period of cross-border drought, then identified FHS in oil palm concessions and pulp plantations with compounds to Singapore and Malaysia. Recurrent episodes of cross-border brush despite the adoption of the AATHP have drawn the spotlight on the non-compliance with the Jakarta contract. In 2016, ASEAN ministers responsible for environment, land, forest fires and duality reviewed the implementation of the AATHP. They made a statement in which they “commit themselves through concerted national efforts and regional cooperation to effectively implement the AATHP […] By 2020, ASEAN without haze will be achieved.  But with 2020 to a few months, the AATHP has not achieved this goal.  The tidal crisis occurred in the midst of The devastating Asian financial crisis. The time had come for the countries of the region to face this disaster. Following the disagreement between the two ministries, two years after Indonesia ratified the agreement, local governments are still unaware of it. Article 11 of the anti-pollution agreement required States Parties to conclude, among other things, that the ASEAN agreement on cross-border haze pollution was proposed in 2001 and adopted in 2002. The aim was to add a legally binding dimension to the RHAP and to establish a contractual regime on the issue of cross-border turnalité. It calls on Member States to cooperate in the prevention, control and mitigation of cross-border land pollution; requested from neighbouring countries for relevant information; take legal, administrative and/or other measures to comply with its obligations under the agreement. In 2015, it was finally ratified by all Member States after Indonesia`s decision to register.
As Revealed by Greenpeace Indonesia below, many fire-related companies in Indonesia have links to Singapore or Malaysia. However, despite Singapore`s much-vaunted Transboundary Haze Pollution Act, his government has taken no serious steps to ensure that Singapore-based producers, distributors or consumer brands or their Singapore-based owners are duly punished for their contribution to fires. In September 2019, a spokesman for the National Environment Agency said the Singapore government had sent “a diplomatic communication to Indonesia expressing concern about fires and turrsion,” but did not indicate further action.  Indonesia also refused to assist Singapore in its sanctioning efforts and not to disclose information on the cards and concession limits that would allow the Singapore authorities to determine which companies were responsible for the fires and cross-border turquality. The agreement is managed by environment ministers and other representatives of ASEAN countries. The meetings are coordinated within the ASEAN Socio-Cultural Community Council (ASCC), one of three councils that are part of the ASEAN Summit and its presidency.  We wanted to know how local governments envisaged an agreement between ASEAN countries on pollution pollution from pollution from pollution, which Indonesia ratified two years ago. Cross-border duality was identified by maps published by the ASEAN Specialised Meteorological Centre (ASMC).  Daily maps showing where and when cross-border tides occurred indicate that the cross-border tide could be grouped into two periods: if Indonesia maintains its non-compliant behaviour, the regional community will continue to accuse Indonesia of the problems of the turbage of Southeast Asia.
Previously, Indonesia`s non-ratification delayed the establishment of theby